Re: Gamblers and Handicappers, Top of the Ninth (468 Views)
Posted by:
fkach (IP Logged)
Date: August 12, 2007 09:35AM
Chuckles,
The problem is that you present your OPINIONS and weak evidence against Pletcher as if they offer irrefutable proof that the rest of us are too dumb to understand. You also seem to obsess over him. IMO, most people would probably argue that there are many better targets for attack among the leading trainers.
We are allowed to have suspicions and sometimes we even know someone is guilty without being able to prove it. However, there are some very logical legal explanations for TP's training success and for the performances of many of the horses you have complained about. IMHO, that much is so clear, it gets hard to swallow your attitude on this.
I think if you presented your evidence as reasons for suspicion and listened carefully to the counter arguments, we wouldn't have to debate this endlessly and no one would have a problem with your view.