Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
B.C. Review (1484 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: October 29, 2002 07:41PM

1- It wasn't as obvious as last year, but there was a dead rail, which happens frequently at Arlington. The only horse who got a top racing on the rail on the backstretch, second turn and stretch was Thunderello. Among the horses who may have been compromised were Summer Colony, Santa Catarina, Whywhywhy, Dollar Bill, and Perfect Drift.

2- It's hard to know what to make of the Euro-numbers. The horses in the mile ended up running a couple of points better than I gave them for their European races, while the FM turf figures were dead on, unbelievably so. With the exception of Domedriver, I believe every horse that ran a "new top" was a 3 year old, so they in fact may have really done so-- I think it was only 3 or 4 of them, and a lot of the other 3 year olds ran right back to their Euro numbers. On balance, I think we had it right, with the possible exception of Domedriver's second race back, where I decided Time-Form had him too fast. I would add that Banks Hill ran exactly back to the figure I gave her in the same race.


3- Storm Flag Flying is the greatest 2 year old filly in history, by far. I said before the race that I didn't know what result would confirm our figures or Ragozin's for the 9/15 race-- I meant that she could be played to x on either (I didn't have her on a ticket). But she ran back to the 1 1/2, so it should be clear who was right, and that Ragozin not only got it wrong, but got it wrong by a whole bunch.

4- Rock of Gibraltar ran a very big figure, and is a very good horse. But he got no worse a trip than he figured to get from out there, and there were several horses who got really messed up by the break down, like Aldebaran.

5- Between the press party Thursday and Saturday at least 5 people told me they knew for a fact that Orientate was lame.

6- Starine got me back my losses from the early part of the card.

7- I think With Anticipation got the best BC grass figure ever, and lost, due to ground loss.

8- A win/place bet on Volponi and the exacta made me a decent winner. Not huge, decent.

We will post BC sheets, with the numbers they ran, in ROTW. Hopefully Ragozin will also post full sheets, but I doubt it. I've seen them, and I'll let you draw your own conclusions.



TGJB



Subject Written By Posted
B.C. Review (1484 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 07:41PM
Re: B.C. Review (834 Views) Marc At 10/29/2002 08:04PM
Re: B.C. Review (942 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 08:38PM
Re: B.C. Review (944 Views) Mall 10/29/2002 09:06PM
Re: B.C. Review (893 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 09:22PM
Re: B.C. Review (934 Views) Mall 10/29/2002 10:05PM
Re: B.C. Review (894 Views) Ray B 11/02/2002 02:58PM
Re: B.C. Review (990 Views) TGJB 11/02/2002 04:23PM
Re: B.C. Review (903 Views) Robert E. Bernard 11/02/2002 10:33PM
Re: B.C. Review (855 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 02:43PM
Re: B.C. Review (806 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 04:10PM
Re: B.C. Review (883 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 04:37PM
Re: B.C. Review (953 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 04:57PM
Re: B.C. Review (909 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 05:22PM
Re: B.C. Review (900 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 06:07PM
Re: B.C. Review (807 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (968 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 07:27PM
Re: B.C. Review (970 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:36PM
Re: B.C. Review (989 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 07:50PM
Re: B.C. Review (897 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 08:17PM
Re: B.C. Review (946 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 08:42PM
Re: B.C. Review (909 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (862 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 09:17PM
Re: B.C. Review (947 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:26PM
Re: B.C. Review (913 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 09:38PM
Re: B.C. Review (871 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:49PM
Re: B.C. Review (926 Views) Alydar in California 10/31/2002 08:43AM
Re: B.C. Review (847 Views) Marc At 10/31/2002 08:50PM
Re: B.C. Review (907 Views) TGJB 10/31/2002 09:07PM
Re: B.C. Review (898 Views) Michael D. 10/31/2002 10:00PM
Re: B.C. Review (747 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 08:46PM
Re: B.C. Review (868 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 08:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (851 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 07:31PM
Re: B.C. Review (936 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:42PM
Re: B.C. Review (845 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 06:23PM
Re: B.C. Review (975 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:13PM
Re: B.C. Review (866 Views) Michael D. 10/29/2002 08:18PM
Re: B.C. Review (935 Views) fastspeed 10/30/2002 06:36AM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (928 Views) HP 10/31/2002 08:43PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (862 Views) TGJB 10/31/2002 08:46PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (830 Views) Michael D. 10/31/2002 10:35PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (932 Views) HP 11/01/2002 11:57AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.