Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (928 Views)
Posted by: HP (IP Logged)
Date: October 31, 2002 08:43PM

From JB's review

"The only horse who got a top racing on the rail on the backstretch, second turn and stretch was Thunderello. Among the horses who may have been compromised were Summer Colony, Santa Catarina, Whywhywhy, Dollar Bill, and Perfect Drift."

All of the horses named had other excuses besides dead rail. I loved Summer Colony, but I would accept your pre-race analysis that she may have been baked. Santa Catarina looked like a good bet to pair, but you could argue that she was a 2yo filly who just backed up off the top. Whywhywhy is a Mr. Greeley and a little suspect around two turns, also coming in off a pair of 4's, which are strong 2yo numbers. Dollar Bill ran a bunch of good ones (if memory serves about three or four 1-2's) and may have just thrown an off race. As for Perfect Drift, having seen him run like crap with my eminently logical money on his back before, his poor performance illustrates nothing to me.

Are these implausible explanations that have less currency than "dead rail"? Tough call, I would think, and I sure you gave it plenty of consideration. Thunderello was ripping, and that looked like evidence (big time) to the contrary to me. Sign me, curious (yellow). HP



Subject Written By Posted
B.C. Review (1485 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 07:41PM
Re: B.C. Review (835 Views) Marc At 10/29/2002 08:04PM
Re: B.C. Review (943 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 08:38PM
Re: B.C. Review (945 Views) Mall 10/29/2002 09:06PM
Re: B.C. Review (894 Views) TGJB 10/29/2002 09:22PM
Re: B.C. Review (935 Views) Mall 10/29/2002 10:05PM
Re: B.C. Review (895 Views) Ray B 11/02/2002 02:58PM
Re: B.C. Review (991 Views) TGJB 11/02/2002 04:23PM
Re: B.C. Review (903 Views) Robert E. Bernard 11/02/2002 10:33PM
Re: B.C. Review (856 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 02:43PM
Re: B.C. Review (807 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 04:10PM
Re: B.C. Review (884 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 04:37PM
Re: B.C. Review (954 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 04:57PM
Re: B.C. Review (910 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 05:22PM
Re: B.C. Review (901 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 06:07PM
Re: B.C. Review (808 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (969 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 07:27PM
Re: B.C. Review (970 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:36PM
Re: B.C. Review (990 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 07:50PM
Re: B.C. Review (898 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 08:17PM
Re: B.C. Review (947 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 08:42PM
Re: B.C. Review (910 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (863 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 09:17PM
Re: B.C. Review (948 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:26PM
Re: B.C. Review (914 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 09:38PM
Re: B.C. Review (872 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 09:49PM
Re: B.C. Review (927 Views) Alydar in California 10/31/2002 08:43AM
Re: B.C. Review (847 Views) Marc At 10/31/2002 08:50PM
Re: B.C. Review (908 Views) TGJB 10/31/2002 09:07PM
Re: B.C. Review (899 Views) Michael D. 10/31/2002 10:00PM
Re: B.C. Review (748 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 08:46PM
Re: B.C. Review (869 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 08:02PM
Re: B.C. Review (851 Views) Alydar in California 10/30/2002 07:31PM
Re: B.C. Review (937 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:42PM
Re: B.C. Review (846 Views) Marc At 10/30/2002 06:23PM
Re: B.C. Review (976 Views) TGJB 10/30/2002 07:13PM
Re: B.C. Review (867 Views) Michael D. 10/29/2002 08:18PM
Re: B.C. Review (936 Views) fastspeed 10/30/2002 06:36AM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (928 Views) HP 10/31/2002 08:43PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (863 Views) TGJB 10/31/2002 08:46PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (831 Views) Michael D. 10/31/2002 10:35PM
Re: B.C. Review/dead rail (933 Views) HP 11/01/2002 11:57AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.