Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Deaf Frogs (348 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: March 30, 2005 08:58PM

Do we know how many horses are actually in the sample since 1937?

This is from the Beyer article:

* Since 1937, 20 horses have raced in the Derby with a single prep race at 3, and all have failed.

* Of horses with two prep races, only one has succeeded since 1948.

I would guess the 2 prep sample is a lot larger than the one prep sample, but Beyer didn't give the exact number.

The Davidowitz article from DRF Simulcast Weekly 3/7 - 3/13, references the same general stats and his rationale for believing the stat is relevant. Mostly it's just an analysis of the contenders he feels have or have not been prepped properly. No exact numbers there either.

I'll tell you one thing, it seems to be getting so much attention that "even if it is" relevant to getting a spring 3YO ready to run his best at 10F, it might be overcompensated for on the odds board this year. Everyone and his brother might totally throw the limited prep horses out instead of just insisting on a slightly larger margin of safety on the board before betting on one.



Subject Written By Posted
Deaf Frogs (571 Views) TGJB 03/30/2005 07:30PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (348 Views) 03/30/2005 08:58PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (344 Views) TGJB 03/31/2005 02:04PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (336 Views) 03/31/2005 03:02PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (377 Views) TGJB 03/31/2005 03:23PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (354 Views) 03/31/2005 04:17PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (443 Views) TGJB 03/31/2005 04:54PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (370 Views) 03/31/2005 05:04PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (395 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 06:02PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (363 Views) TGJB 03/31/2005 06:22PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (378 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 06:37PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (387 Views) Ron G. 03/31/2005 06:51PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (396 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 07:15PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (392 Views) Ron G. 03/31/2005 08:10PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (352 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 09:29PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (401 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 10:00PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (380 Views) NoCarolinaTony 03/31/2005 10:53PM
high fly (385 Views) Michael D. 04/05/2005 03:04PM
Re: high fly (375 Views) Kasept 04/05/2005 04:14PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (401 Views) NoCarolinaTony 03/31/2005 10:41PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (357 Views) TGJB 04/01/2005 03:20PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (392 Views) NoCarolinaTony 04/01/2005 09:14PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (390 Views) kev 04/01/2005 09:40PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (349 Views) TGJB 04/02/2005 02:19PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (407 Views) spa 03/31/2005 04:47PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (351 Views) 03/31/2005 05:00PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (403 Views) Delmar Deb 03/31/2005 06:38PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (363 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 06:57PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (358 Views) Delmar Deb 03/31/2005 07:13PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (362 Views) Michael D. 03/31/2005 07:19PM
Re: Deaf Frogs (393 Views) Delmar Deb 04/01/2005 06:20AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.