Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: David, David, David. (1194 Views)
Posted by: Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: May 30, 2002 09:29AM
JB has already handled much of this. What's left?
David Patent writes: "Alydar, you are 100 percent correct on the epistemology/teleology issue. My mistake."
Thank you for admitting your error, David.
Patent writes: "It has been 18 years since my justice class with Sandel."
Why did you write this sentence, David? There is a Sandel who teaches at Harvard. He is fairly well known. And on a different string, you wrote that you went to law school. Are you trying to tell us that you are a Harvard-educated lawyer? Why tell us? Why not prove it with the logic of your arguments?
Patent writes: "I have already dealt with your and Alydar's point on how you get a tight range without changing variants within a race. All you need is to start with the hypothesis that you start with--the tight range hypothesis. As long as you apply it to every race then your ranges will work out nicely."
This is illogical crap. You have never made figures using the projection method, David. If you start making figures in a phony tight range, and if those figures are inaccurate, your figures will come apart at the seams. HP was right. You are making a fool out of yourself. See if you can follow this: A phony tight range means inaccurate numbers. When projecting figures, inaccurate numbers have the same effect as inaccurate result charts--everything goes to hell. THE HORSES ARE COMING OUT OF DIFFERENT RACES.
Patent writes: "I'm not disagreeing with that math."
Earlier, on the identical question, Patent wrote: "Jerry--your math here is just wrong."
Patent writes some BS about not remembering the bet JB proposed to him:
David. You split the strings to cover your own ineptitude. Look the damn thing up. It "invalidates" half of your latest argument.
Patent writes that he has bought Thoro-Graph twice and is convinced Rags is better.
Why am I not surprised?
Going against the thrust of his previous statement, Patent writes that track maintenance doesn't significantly change the speed of the track.
Read Bruno De Julio in the archives. Read Jack Kaenal in "A Breed Apart." Lose your blind faith. Open your eyes.
Patent writes that Ragozin's office is "a bunch of communist/socialists."
Nonsense, David. If you read the Sheets board, you would know that Friedman wrote that Ragozin's office had conservatives and mushy liberals, too.
Patent writes: "[JB] doesn't care about the track surface."
Later, Patent writes: "It's not about motive, it's about philosophy."
David, I still have a soft spot for you, but I have to tell you that you have become a damn joke. If you disagree with this assessment, please let me know. I will happily argue this with you until there is nothing left to argue about. Never have I been so confident.
Last Words? (2305 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/28/2002 10:51PM |
Didn't we already talk science? (1308 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 12:10AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1206 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 12:33AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1118 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 12:43AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1151 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 01:11AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1098 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:27PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1205 Views)
|
Mall |
05/29/2002 02:12AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1209 Views)
|
tegger |
05/29/2002 03:39AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1162 Views)
|
Mark O'Keeffe |
05/29/2002 04:58AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1202 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 08:23AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1222 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 04:28PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1175 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:02PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1076 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 05:35PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1132 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 06:11PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1135 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 07:18PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1171 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 07:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1101 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 08:16PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1096 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1161 Views)
|
teekay |
06/03/2002 08:17PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1218 Views)
|
mandown |
05/29/2002 09:58PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1127 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:25AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1077 Views)
|
mandown |
05/30/2002 02:46AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1208 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/30/2002 03:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1194 Views) |
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 09:29AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1189 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:03PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1160 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1142 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:38PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1214 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 10:25PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1234 Views)
|
Mall |
05/30/2002 10:48PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1104 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 12:02AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1188 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 03:37AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1268 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:25AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1110 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:30AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1157 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:42PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1209 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:45PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1130 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:50PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1269 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 01:16PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1119 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:41PM |
Re: jerry (1259 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 05:34PM |
Re: jerry (1129 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 05:56PM |
Re: jerry (1124 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/31/2002 06:02PM |
Re: jerry (1176 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:20PM |
Re: jerry (1193 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:32PM |
Re: jerry (1084 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:55PM |
Re: jerry (1167 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:35PM |
Re: jerry (1084 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:33PM |
Re: jerry (1059 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 09:44PM |
Re: jerry (1154 Views)
|
Michael D. |
05/31/2002 10:05PM |
Re: jerry (1213 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 10:34PM |
Re: jerry (1152 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:06PM |
Re: endless bitchy catfights (1165 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
06/01/2002 07:21AM |
Re: jerry (1180 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/01/2002 08:32PM |
Re: jerry (1239 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/02/2002 04:13PM |
Re: jerry (1329 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/03/2002 07:40PM |
Bill Clinton Medallion of Merit (1270 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
06/01/2002 03:15AM |
Re: jerry (1153 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:27PM |
David: Two More Things To Think About (1132 Views)
|
Mall |
05/31/2002 08:42PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1046 Views)
|
BrettFavre |
05/31/2002 09:34PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1159 Views)
|
tgab |
05/31/2002 10:20PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1116 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:04PM |
Re: jerry (1205 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:12PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1153 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:07PM |
Re: alydar (1202 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 04:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1133 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
06/03/2002 11:53PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1155 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
06/04/2002 07:37AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1078 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1081 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:10PM |
track speed (1168 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/29/2002 11:37AM |
Re: Last Words? (962 Views)
|
HP |
05/29/2002 01:20PM |
Re: Last Words? (1167 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 05:50PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|