Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Mild Dissent. (1152 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: May 31, 2002 04:07PM
I’m going to leave most of this to Alydar. Briefly:
Your A—I predicted 3 possible things they could do with the race, the third of which was hedge. That’s what they did, and that’s why it was almost right—meaning almost in line with his too-slow Maryland numbers. Your misrepresentation of my position is intentional.
A1---They did not use the same sprint/route relationship as earlier in the card—if they had the 13th would have come up too slow. They had the right idea (completely contrary to what they posted several times in defense of Wood Memorial and other numbers, which hypocrisy was the second of the 3 possibilities I laid out), they just didn’t go far enough—they hedged. If they had applied the same logic to the relationships between the 11th and 12th they wouldn’t have blown the Schaefer figure, at least not that badly.
B---I didn’t say it would expose him as a scoundrel, just as either dogmatic in the face of strong evidence or a hypocrite. I would say I got my money’s worth, especially since Friedman conceded that there is no fixed relationship between sprints and routes, which by itself undermines most of the “logic” underpinning your comments of the last 2 weeks.
C---“Fact”: Friedman made a statement. Fact: The relationship between the 6th race (route) and the 8th and 9th (the next two dirt races, sprints) on Ragozin is almost 3 points different than that between the first and second, and the 13th to the 11th and 12th.
That would be me, responding directly to your points. You could try that some time. Whoops, I forgot—they taught you at Harvard Law that it is better to be “right” than right.
TGJB
Last Words? (2304 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/28/2002 10:51PM |
Didn't we already talk science? (1308 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 12:10AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1206 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 12:33AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1116 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 12:43AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1151 Views)
|
Treadhead |
05/29/2002 01:11AM |
Re: Didn't we already talk science? (1097 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:27PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1205 Views)
|
Mall |
05/29/2002 02:12AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1208 Views)
|
tegger |
05/29/2002 03:39AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1162 Views)
|
Mark O'Keeffe |
05/29/2002 04:58AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1202 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 08:23AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1219 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 04:28PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1173 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:02PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1076 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 05:35PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1131 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 06:11PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1135 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/29/2002 07:18PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1170 Views)
|
JimP |
05/29/2002 07:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1099 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 08:16PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1094 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1160 Views)
|
teekay |
06/03/2002 08:17PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1216 Views)
|
mandown |
05/29/2002 09:58PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1127 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/30/2002 12:25AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1076 Views)
|
mandown |
05/30/2002 02:46AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1206 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/30/2002 03:48AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1193 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 09:29AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1187 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:03PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1160 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/29/2002 05:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1141 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
05/29/2002 05:38PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1214 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/30/2002 10:25PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1233 Views)
|
Mall |
05/30/2002 10:48PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1103 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 12:02AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1187 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 03:37AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1267 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:25AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1109 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:30AM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1155 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:42PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1208 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:45PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1128 Views)
|
David G. Patent |
05/31/2002 12:50PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1269 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 01:16PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1118 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:41PM |
Re: jerry (1258 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 05:34PM |
Re: jerry (1129 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 05:56PM |
Re: jerry (1124 Views)
|
David Patent |
05/31/2002 06:02PM |
Re: jerry (1174 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:20PM |
Re: jerry (1193 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 06:32PM |
Re: jerry (1083 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:55PM |
Re: jerry (1166 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
05/31/2002 07:35PM |
Re: jerry (1082 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:33PM |
Re: jerry (1058 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 09:44PM |
Re: jerry (1153 Views)
|
Michael D. |
05/31/2002 10:05PM |
Re: jerry (1211 Views)
|
Jason L. |
05/31/2002 10:34PM |
Re: jerry (1151 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:06PM |
Re: endless bitchy catfights (1165 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
06/01/2002 07:21AM |
Re: jerry (1178 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/01/2002 08:32PM |
Re: jerry (1237 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/02/2002 04:13PM |
Re: jerry (1327 Views)
|
Jason L. |
06/03/2002 07:40PM |
Bill Clinton Medallion of Merit (1268 Views)
|
Anonymous User |
06/01/2002 03:15AM |
Re: jerry (1153 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 08:27PM |
David: Two More Things To Think About (1131 Views)
|
Mall |
05/31/2002 08:42PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1045 Views)
|
BrettFavre |
05/31/2002 09:34PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1155 Views)
|
tgab |
05/31/2002 10:20PM |
Re: David: Two More Things To Think About (1115 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/31/2002 11:04PM |
Re: jerry (1204 Views)
|
HP |
05/31/2002 06:12PM |
Re: Mild Dissent. (1152 Views) |
TGJB |
05/31/2002 04:07PM |
Re: alydar (1201 Views)
|
superfreakicus |
05/31/2002 04:37PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1133 Views)
|
Patrick Morgan |
06/03/2002 11:53PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1155 Views)
|
Alydar in California |
06/04/2002 07:37AM |
Re: David, David, David. (1078 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:15PM |
Re: David, David, David. (1079 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 03:10PM |
track speed (1166 Views)
|
nunzio |
05/29/2002 11:37AM |
Re: Last Words? (962 Views)
|
HP |
05/29/2002 01:20PM |
Re: Last Words? (1166 Views)
|
TGJB |
05/29/2002 05:50PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|