Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Beyerexpert (666 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: October 08, 2003 07:32PM

Thank you for that thoughtful post about pace, speed figures, separate track variants etc... I am happy someone understands and commented on the issues I am bringing up.

It's quite a problem unless you pay close attention because you want to make sure you don't double count certain aspects of trip that the figure maker might have included in his variant.

I have often seen situations where a figure maker made a separate variant for a race because they thought the track was slower for that race, when in fact the race was slower because of the pace and not the track speed.

They stumble into the right figure for the wrong reason for some horses and a totally wrong figure for other horses in the same race by adjusting it. (just as in your example)

Personally, I think ALL aspects of trip should be left out of the figure and variant process. That includes the impact of extreme paces and paths.

It doesn't matter what you think about bias or the impact of being wide etc.... I would prefer to simply have that information separately and quantify the impact separately based on my own study of those issues.

The obvious case is when a horse is 3-4 wide on both turns and another on the rail all the way and they finish close. On a neutral track that means one thing. On a dead rail that means something else. On a golden rail that means something else. Bias is super tough to determine, but it is simply obvious that some tracks do not play the same every day. It's easy to observe the extremes even if it's difficult to take it to the level suggested by some authors and players. So I defintely pay attention to the extremes. Otherwise the figures are completely worthless for those days. Without that knowledge you'll wind up making up all sorts of dumb reasons for the variance of some horses' form.

Another less obvious example is WHEN a horse is wide and how hard he is being used at that time.

It is pretty clear to me that if you are a closer that is 3-4 wide first turn in the middle/back of the pack and the pace is moderate, that is having MUCH LESS of a negative impact than a front runner that is 3-4 wide first turn into a hot pace. The latter is dead meat and the former is not doing much that will take any starch out of his kick later.

I could go on, but at least we are on the same wavelength.



Subject Written By Posted
Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (1055 Views) 09/17/2003 08:24AM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (596 Views) jbelfior 09/17/2003 10:53AM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (596 Views) 09/17/2003 02:27PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (581 Views) TGJB 09/17/2003 01:37PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (611 Views) 09/17/2003 02:52PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (688 Views) jbelfior 09/17/2003 04:56PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (611 Views) derby1592 09/17/2003 07:54PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (649 Views) 09/18/2003 07:24PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (563 Views) 09/17/2003 02:57PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (657 Views) TGJB 09/17/2003 03:04PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (615 Views) 09/17/2003 03:14PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (689 Views) 09/17/2003 03:08PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (622 Views) TGJB 09/17/2003 03:21PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (564 Views) 09/17/2003 03:48PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (681 Views) JimP 09/17/2003 04:23PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (599 Views) texasturfmaster 09/19/2003 05:33PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (617 Views) TGJB 09/19/2003 06:19PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (560 Views) fasteddie 09/18/2003 10:02AM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (579 Views) 09/18/2003 07:26PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (631 Views) TGJB 09/19/2003 12:36PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (605 Views) 09/19/2003 03:42PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (576 Views) 09/17/2003 02:37PM
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (635 Views) beyerguy 10/08/2003 06:21PM
Beyerexpert (666 Views) 10/08/2003 07:32PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.