Order Online |
Complete Menu of
TG Data products |
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data |
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse |
Free Products |
Download and Review previous days' data. |
With detailed comments |
Email notification when your horse races |
Information |
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials |
Consulting services and Graph Racing |
Where to buy TG around the country |
Historical
races and handicapping articles |
Handicapping |
Major handicapping contest winners |
|
|
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (577 Views)
Date: September 17, 2003 02:37PM
>Look no furthur than the results of last Saturday's Jerome @ Belmont Park. DURING (who came out of the faster pace KB) beat up on PRETTY WILD by 5 lenghts.<
I had a huge bet on During for that very reason and that's why I brought the subject up here.
I know for a fact that Beyer split the variant and bumped up the the figure for the King's Bishop - otherwise During would have had a figure of around 92 and the winner would have gotten around a 97. I know another figure make that did the same thing.
Those earned figures were silly relative the ability of those horses. Horses that finished well beaten had even lower figures.
I am arguing that it was incorrect to split the variant in this case because the problem was PACE and not a change in the track speed.
The figure should have been reported as is (LOW), and astute handicappers should have known that everyone close to it (like During for example) was toasted by it.
On the flip side, perhaps Ghostzapper did not run quite as well as it looks because he was Well Off the pace. That's is not totally clear to me.
In some of these pace examples, you will often find players using the adjusted speed figure and then compensating AGAIN for the pace - in effect double counting.
Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (1059 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 08:24AM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (599 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/17/2003 10:53AM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (598 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 02:27PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (583 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/17/2003 01:37PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (613 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 02:52PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (693 Views)
|
jbelfior |
09/17/2003 04:56PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (613 Views)
|
derby1592 |
09/17/2003 07:54PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (654 Views)
|
|
09/18/2003 07:24PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (567 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 02:57PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (661 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/17/2003 03:04PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (617 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 03:14PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (698 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 03:08PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (626 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/17/2003 03:21PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (568 Views)
|
|
09/17/2003 03:48PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (684 Views)
|
JimP |
09/17/2003 04:23PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (603 Views)
|
texasturfmaster |
09/19/2003 05:33PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (621 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/19/2003 06:19PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (567 Views)
|
fasteddie |
09/18/2003 10:02AM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (582 Views)
|
|
09/18/2003 07:26PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (634 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/19/2003 12:36PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (609 Views)
|
|
09/19/2003 03:42PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (577 Views) |
|
09/17/2003 02:37PM |
Re: Pace, Final Time, Kings Bishop (639 Views)
|
beyerguy |
10/08/2003 06:21PM |
Beyerexpert (670 Views)
|
|
10/08/2003 07:32PM |
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
|