Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (632 Views)
Posted by:
richiebee (IP Logged)
Date: August 31, 2005 10:18PM
TGJB-- Congrats on the 43. Sounds like you "bounced" on the back 9, but of course the wind should be taken into account.
Jimbo-- Since these various tools are used in different ways by different people, my belief is that it would be very difficult to rate these products(Beyer, Sheets, TGs) in any scientific way.
Possibly the most efficient way to undertake the comparison you mentioned would be for a single unbiased handicapper to use both products during a meet, alternate days or maybe alternate weeks. Considering the fact that Rags and TG are making figures for tracks all over the country all year round, a sample based on results from one short meet wouldn't be too convincing.
To this neophyte, the tools produced by The Guru Jerry Brown and the self proclaimed "Father" of all speed figures seem so similar in terms of methodology-identifying patterns, seeking animals ready to peak, avoiding animals ready to bounce.
These are both good products, IMO. I feel comfortable preferring to use one without disparaging the other. The long running feud between Rags and TGJB, the colorful vituperations of some of the posters on the other board, these are nothing more than sometimes entertaining distractions.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1305 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (710 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (725 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (646 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (675 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (583 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (662 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (677 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (606 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (605 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (661 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (692 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (638 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (630 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (603 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (620 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (582 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (696 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (668 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (678 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (632 Views) |
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (655 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (681 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (687 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (647 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (671 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (590 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (618 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (631 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (691 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (636 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (665 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |