Re: please JB (630 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: September 01, 2005 01:10PM
CTC,
If you are trying to get at who is producing the most accurate figures, you have to remove the handicapping skill from the results and it has to be an apples to apples comparison.
You can't isolate the quality of the figures using handicappers that might have different skill levels. I could probably get better results than my grandmother using raw final times no matter what set of figures you gave her. :)
You can't compare speed figures with weight and ground loss to those without because you can't tell if the different results are because of the quality of the figures or the incremental information included in one set vs. the other.
To determine if incremental information is better you have to compare the results using the same set of figures with and without the incremental information.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1305 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (710 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (725 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (646 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (675 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (582 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (662 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (677 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (606 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (605 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (661 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (692 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (638 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (630 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (603 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (620 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (582 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (696 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (668 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (678 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (632 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (655 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (681 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (687 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (647 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (671 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (590 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (618 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (630 Views) |
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (691 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (636 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (665 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |