The problem with any type of comparison is the person interpreting the figs. I'm friends with many RAG users and we compare figs and opinions all the time. Sometimes they are right and sometimes I'm right. I win more often than my RAG friends BUT I'm more into "spot"shots and they are into spreading and stabbing in the exotics and multi wagers. Not a fair comparison.

One way to compare would be to get a few experienced sheet players from both camps and give them both sets of data. Let them handicap a card with TG and make their selections. Next,let them handicap the same card using Rags and make their selections.I think after 30 cards in should be fairly evident how successful each person is with both sets of data.

Of course, TG and RAGS could put together a serious, legal, "buy in" type contest where everyone could put there serious money where their big...err opinion is.The results of such a contest may give some indication as to which data is more solid. On the other hand, it may only prove who is the best interpreter.