Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (710 Views)
Posted by:
kev (IP Logged)
Date: August 31, 2005 08:13PM
what's the big deal with this : "2-- Let me get this straight, Len. You don't want to do Jimbo's study because it is purely mechanical and doesn't take into account patterns, but you quote the results of a decade-plus old study that was done purely mechanically and doesn't take into account patterns. Do I have that right?"
He said no to doing it, but if he wanted to really know about doing something like it, there's already been a study done. Let me ask you this........Why would even any of you guys ( Len--Jerry ) want to do a test like this anyhow. This is not how you teach your people to use the product, what if one or the other did real bad, what would it do?? Nothing, that's why one of you would say what I just said, that's not how we use our product. The big studys should be done in pattern's and bounces and good stuff like that. Jerry you down for something like that anyways--the best fig. out of the last three crap?? Hell what if they threw in beyers number's and they did better, ouch.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1305 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (710 Views) |
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (726 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (646 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (676 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (583 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (663 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (677 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (607 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (606 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (661 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (693 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (638 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (630 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (603 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (621 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (582 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (697 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (669 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (679 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (634 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (656 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (682 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (688 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (647 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (671 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (590 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (618 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (631 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (692 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (637 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (666 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |