I can't even get mad. I certainly didn't call him stupid or dumb. It has been a number of years since namecalling was "in". About 3rd grade, from what I remember.

His comments on his board were dumb and disingenuous. As anybody that runs any kind of business will tell you, every business has competitors and marketing is part of any business model. Even us "dumb gamblers" realize that. For Len to say he has no competitors, doesn't market, doesn't need to market, etc.etc. was just a sermon on the mount to appear "above it all" for his customer base. I am sure he has a customer base that is smart enough to see through that kind of BS, but none of them apparently post on his board.

He was very very quick to react negatively to my post regarding a study of the products. As most objective people know, there is no way to predict what would have happened in that study. I am sure that Jerry is confident his product is better and the guys over there should feel confident that theirs is better. But Len's reaction to the study, as well as his lack of reaction to various handicapping contests, is a telling sign.

Interesting how he tried to make the study that I proposed into an issue about paying for his product. What the heck is that all about? Having a daily user of his product work with me (a daily user of the Tgraph product), and compare the numbers to see which numbers hold up better was a proposal to compare the figures. Not some longwinded scheme for me to avoid paying $25 for his product or for the RAgs user to avoid the $25 for the Tgraph product. How stupid is that?

For the record, it is very clear in the study that Len sent me (12 years old) that the figures from all providers in the study were given free of charge. Not that I was asking for that, but I just want to point out how he tried to create some type of octopus ink cloud to avoid the real topics.