Here We Go Again (677 Views)
Posted by:
TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: September 01, 2005 03:36PM
Okay, here we go again. Len has this time not just taken a shot at me, but at a customer of mine. Again, Jimbo can handle it, but I'm going to make a couple of points:
1-- "I've generally been pretty good at ignoring the lies about the SHEETS and myself that appear regularly elsewhere..."
Len, don't hold back. Please do everybody a favor, and respond directly to my "lies" next time. For once. You can even do it here.
2-- Not that it matters, but Jimbo's comments characterized your comments, not you. See above for what he actually said, and context. Some of that context is that this started with Jimbo politely proposing that Ragozin guys join him in an objective test of both data services. Readers can draw their own conclusions as to why that struck a nerve.
3-- Oh, Len. I don't know whether you give the data to Frankel for free, but I doubt it. I think you give it to him and others for very little, which has the same effect. In fact, I have asked you publicly to tell us your rates for horsemen a couple of times, so the public can have some context in comparing the policies of the two companies. Since you are OUTRAGED at Jimbo's suggestion, how about clearing things up once and for all? I went through the math once on this site, and I think it worked out that even if I gave Frankel a 50% discount for bulk, I would charge him something like 250k a year. What do you charge him? What does he get?
4-- We have a conundrum. You say you don't give your data to any media/track employee for free in exchange for any testimonials. Yet Harvey Pack has gone on record publicly many times saying he gets your data for free, and he not only pushed your data and ripped TG while wearing a NYRA jacket at the "Paddock Club" a few dozen times (he used to call us the "cheap sheets", until I called the NYRA head of marketing and put a stop to it), he also quoted your figures and barred anyone from saying "Thoro-Graph" on the NYRA replay show for years, and made them re-tape a segment when Phil Johnson quoted one of our figures.
Was Harvey lying? Does he pay for your sheets?
5-- "I've posted this here where it can't be directly replied to as there is nothing here that needs any comment or debate pro or con..."
Of course that's why you did it.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1306 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (711 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (726 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (676 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (583 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (663 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (677 Views) |
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (607 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (606 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (661 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (693 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (638 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (630 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (603 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (621 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (582 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (697 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (669 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (679 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (634 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (656 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (682 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (688 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (648 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (671 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (591 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (619 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (631 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (692 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (637 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (666 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |