Re: please JB (671 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: September 01, 2005 11:48AM
That might be an interesting handicapping contest but it wouldn't say much about the figures. It would say something about the skill of the handicappers. The only way to measure the figures is to remove all human/subjective elements from the selections - like best figure last time out, best of last 2, average of last 2 etc....
By the way, that wouldn't be true if you were comparing figures other than RAG and TG because Beyer, Bris etc... don't incorporate ground loss and weight.
If you compared anyone other than TG and Rags, you would be measuring both the quality and whether or not adding those things into the figure is a net plus or minus whithout really being able to tell whether quality or content was the reason for the performance.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/01/2005 11:52AM by classhandicapper.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1306 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (711 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (726 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (676 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (583 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (663 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (647 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (678 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (607 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (606 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (661 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (693 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (638 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (630 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (603 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (621 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (582 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (697 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (669 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (679 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (634 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (633 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (656 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (682 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (688 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (648 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (671 Views) |
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (591 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (619 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (631 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (692 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (637 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (666 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |