Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (636 Views)
Posted by:
miff (IP Logged)
Date: September 01, 2005 10:39AM
The problem with any type of comparison is the person interpreting the figs. I'm friends with many RAG users and we compare figs and opinions all the time. Sometimes they are right and sometimes I'm right. I win more often than my RAG friends BUT I'm more into "spot"shots and they are into spreading and stabbing in the exotics and multi wagers. Not a fair comparison.
One way to compare would be to get a few experienced sheet players from both camps and give them both sets of data. Let them handicap a card with TG and make their selections. Next,let them handicap the same card using Rags and make their selections.I think after 30 cards in should be fairly evident how successful each person is with both sets of data.
Of course, TG and RAGS could put together a serious, legal, "buy in" type contest where everyone could put there serious money where their big...err opinion is.The results of such a contest may give some indication as to which data is more solid. On the other hand, it may only prove who is the best interpreter.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1311 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (714 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (730 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (650 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (680 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (587 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (636 Views) |
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (666 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (649 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (680 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (610 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (610 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (663 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (696 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (642 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (633 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (607 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (625 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (585 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (699 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (673 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (681 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (636 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (635 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (658 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (684 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (690 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (651 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (675 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (594 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (622 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (634 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (695 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (639 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (668 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |