Re: please JB (634 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: September 01, 2005 01:10PM
CTC,
If you are trying to get at who is producing the most accurate figures, you have to remove the handicapping skill from the results and it has to be an apples to apples comparison.
You can't isolate the quality of the figures using handicappers that might have different skill levels. I could probably get better results than my grandmother using raw final times no matter what set of figures you gave her. :)
You can't compare speed figures with weight and ground loss to those without because you can't tell if the different results are because of the quality of the figures or the incremental information included in one set vs. the other.
To determine if incremental information is better you have to compare the results using the same set of figures with and without the incremental information.
Come on, Len. Knock it off. (1311 Views)
|
TGJB |
08/31/2005 06:24PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (714 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 08:13PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (730 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 09:54PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (650 Views)
|
kev |
08/31/2005 10:20PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (680 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
08/31/2005 10:50PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (587 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 09:42AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (637 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 10:39AM |
Study, What Study? (666 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 12:31AM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (649 Views)
|
sighthound |
09/01/2005 02:59AM |
Here We Go Again (680 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 03:36PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (610 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (610 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (663 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 04:32PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (696 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/02/2005 03:46AM |
Re: Here We Go Again (642 Views)
|
richiebee |
09/01/2005 04:16PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (633 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:21PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (607 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:22PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (625 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:30PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (585 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 04:39PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (699 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 04:42PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (673 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 05:01PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (681 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 05:06PM |
Re: Here We Go Again (636 Views)
|
miff |
09/01/2005 05:07PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (635 Views)
|
richiebee |
08/31/2005 10:18PM |
Re: Come on, Len. Knock it off. (658 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:57AM |
please JB (684 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 11:00AM |
Re: please JB (690 Views)
|
TGJB |
09/01/2005 11:39AM |
Re: please JB (651 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:45AM |
Re: please JB (675 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 11:48AM |
Re: please JB (594 Views)
|
Chuckles_the_Clown2 |
09/01/2005 11:58AM |
Re: please JB (622 Views)
|
horsegoer |
09/01/2005 12:19PM |
Re: please JB (634 Views) |
|
09/01/2005 01:10PM |
Re: please JB (695 Views)
|
jimbo66 |
09/01/2005 01:27PM |
Re: please JB (639 Views)
|
|
09/01/2005 01:30PM |
Re: please JB (668 Views)
|
kev |
09/01/2005 06:29PM |