Re: (640 Views)
Posted by:
Michael D. (IP Logged)
Date: November 15, 2004 04:44PM
care to comment on the unbridled vs WE figs? how about the positive "3.5" you gave AP Indy for winning the '92 BC classic at GP in 2:00.00, while giving a # well into the negative range to a horse that won a 10f stake in around 2:03 at GP a year or two ago. answers to these questions would prove your point (a point that very well could be correct, but one which must be questioned). and again, saying that one track superintendent told you that some tracks have gotten slower will not prove your point...... and by the way, forget me, i can't imagine you are proving anything to anybody on the issue of these long distance #'s.