Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: little hints (584 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: November 17, 2004 09:12AM

Chuckles,

>but I'm still gonna beat Ghostzapper and I'll say when.<

They all get beat due to variations in form, trip, injury etc.... Top horses are also usually more vulnerable in a brand new season.

However, regardless of whether you think Ghostzapper is really a -6, there's no doubt he's a top notch horse.

1. His overall record is excellent in terms of wins per start, winning margins relative to quality of competition, versatility at different distance and on different track conditions etc...

2. In one of his losses he was actually TONS (and I mean TONS) the best. In the loss at Saratoga in the 7F sprint as a 3 year old the track was playing heavily towards speed on the inside. He made a monstrous move from way back on the far outside to just miss. On a neutral track he wins by daylight and that was well before he even got good. His subsequent performance verifies my opinion of the loss.

I don't view him as the best horse I have ever seen despite the figures, but there's no doubt in my mind it's going to take a "terror" to beat him "IF" he comes back as good as he left - even at 10F - which may not be his best distance.



Post Edited (11-17-04 10:20)



Subject Written By Posted
"Faster than they used to be" (937 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 01:18PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (580 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/15/2004 01:37PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (533 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 02:13PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (523 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 02:32PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (637 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 02:55PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (498 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 03:21PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (551 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 03:54PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (511 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 04:13PM
Re: (605 Views) 11/15/2004 04:42PM
Re: (549 Views) miff 11/15/2004 06:50PM
Re: (641 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 04:44PM
Re: (603 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 05:09PM
Re: (545 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 05:29PM
Speed (600 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/15/2004 07:32PM
Re: Speed (586 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 08:40PM
Re: Speed (535 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/16/2004 02:41AM
Re: Speed (494 Views) Michael D. 11/16/2004 06:45AM
Re: Speed (579 Views) 11/16/2004 09:31AM
Re: Speed (514 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/16/2004 11:12AM
Re: Speed (548 Views) 11/16/2004 01:54PM
Re: Speed (553 Views) TGJB 11/16/2004 02:08PM
Re: Speed (574 Views) 11/16/2004 02:24PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (618 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 05:09PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (494 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 06:16PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (573 Views) 11/15/2004 07:30PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (489 Views) Catalin 11/15/2004 08:23PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (624 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 09:00PM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (561 Views) 11/16/2004 09:19AM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (684 Views) miff 11/16/2004 09:51AM
Re: Faster Than They Used To Be (543 Views) RICH 11/16/2004 09:09AM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (557 Views) HP 11/15/2004 04:33PM
Re: (519 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 04:51PM
Re: (560 Views) HP 11/15/2004 05:09PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (630 Views) kev 11/15/2004 09:11PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (544 Views) twoshoes 11/16/2004 11:35AM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (499 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/16/2004 11:43AM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (641 Views) jimbo66 11/16/2004 12:14PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (538 Views) HP 11/16/2004 12:24PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (517 Views) twoshoes 11/16/2004 01:31PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (490 Views) jimbo66 11/16/2004 01:48PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (561 Views) twoshoes 11/16/2004 02:40PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (577 Views) jimbo66 11/16/2004 03:16PM
Re: (533 Views) 11/16/2004 03:38PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (526 Views) twoshoes 11/16/2004 03:55PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (520 Views) twoshoes 11/16/2004 04:02PM
Re: (557 Views) TGJB 11/16/2004 01:47PM
Re: (579 Views) P.Eckhart 11/16/2004 04:07PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (598 Views) TGJB 11/16/2004 04:31PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (588 Views) 11/16/2004 07:47PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (656 Views) TGJB 11/17/2004 02:23PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (591 Views) 11/17/2004 04:30PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (545 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/18/2004 05:09PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (476 Views) kev 11/17/2004 04:39PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (629 Views) kev 11/18/2004 04:33PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (583 Views) TGJB 11/18/2004 04:42PM
Re: Are Racehorses Getting Faster (643 Views) Michael D. 11/17/2004 01:13PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (535 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/16/2004 11:03PM
Re: "Faster than they used to be" (593 Views) Michael D. 11/16/2004 11:31PM
little hints (551 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/17/2004 03:30AM
Re: little hints (584 Views) 11/17/2004 09:12AM
Re: little hints (592 Views) 11/17/2004 09:52AM
Re: little hints (630 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/17/2004 10:39AM
Re: little hints (516 Views) 11/17/2004 11:03AM
Re: (503 Views) 11/16/2004 02:01PM
faster than they used to be (639 Views) 11/16/2004 03:47PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.