Re: Changing Track Speeds: A Derby Contender Case Study Perhaps (631 Views)
Posted by:
P-Dub (IP Logged)
Date: February 13, 2006 12:56PM
Miffed,
My facts are straight. Your whole point is the faulty use of the projection method. Isn't that how the numbers for the winner were derived??
The Rag (perfect name, isn't it) guys put out so much information for us its easy to see why they would feel that way. They have such a great track record of handicapping races beforehand and always post sheets of horses that are questioned by users over here. Its nothing short of ridiculous for you to even bring them up in that context.
Blind follower?? No. Have I ever made numbers? No. But you don't have to be a chef to know whether or not the food tastes bad. I've had more good days than bad with this product. At some point it may be a question of ego with all of you. We have people changing their names to get posted, others letting us all know how brilliant they are (I'm a rocket engineer or whatever, I have X number of degrees, I used to make numbers, I've been blah blah blah). Great for all of you.
As far as the ROTW being poor for the last 70 odd weeks, do you have the numbers on them?? Or are you just projecting??