Re: My Closing Argument on the BG (590 Views)
Posted by:
HP (IP Logged)
Date: April 13, 2005 10:31AM
Class,
You wrote -
"Given 2 horses have been running similar figures, I'd rather have the one that I know for certain ran on an honest track vs. the one that "may have been helped by a biased surface based on limited evidence"."
-- In your posts, I haven't seen you give ONE example of a horse that "for certain ran on an honest track." Virtually EVERY horse "may have been helped by a biased surface based on limited evidence" since you seem to find some kind of possible bias nonsense in EVERY race, EVERY week.
"There's a lot of uncertainty in things like biases, controversial figures, horses unproven at a distance, the impact of pace on time, how a race might develop, etc..."
-- Why don't you try using Thoro-Graph? Seriously. I have not seen any "winning insights" whatsoever in any of your posts, and you post A LOT. It would mean something if any of this stuff actually led to you successfully handicapping a race. Reading this board I'm sure I'm not the only one wondering when or if you will ever provide anything that leads anyone to cash a ticket.
Over the past three weeks I posted my ROTW picks and hit exactas in two of them. No bias, no pace, no nothing. Maybe there is less "uncertainty" just looking at the figures! You must be raking it in with this bias and pace stuff... Add it all up and show us how it works... I'm passing out from holding my breath.
HP